A true Gandhian will not renounce his faith and switchover to alien religion and claim that he is a true follower of Gandhi. It is totally false act. Given below Mr. Gandhi’s advice to true Indian citizen about the dangers of changing the faith.
Christian conversion is the spirit of Satan
1)The spirit of Satan = It is my firm opinion that Europe (and the United States) does not represent the spirit of God or Christianity but the spirit of Satan. And Satan’s successes are the greatest when appears with the name of God on his lips. (Young India: September 8, 1920)
2) I call myself a Sanatani Hindu = I call myself a Sanatani Hindu, because I believe in the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Puranas, and all that goes by the name of Hindu scripture, and therefore in avataras and rebirth; I believe in the varnashrama dharma in a sense, in my opinion strictly Vedic but not in its presently popular and distorted crude sense; I believe in the protection of cow. I do not disbelieve in murti puja. (Young India: June 10, 1921)
3) Negation of Christ’s Christianity = I consider western Christianity in its practical working a negation of Christ’s Christianity. I cannot conceive Jesus, if he was living in flesh in our midst, approving of modern Christian organizations, public worship, or ministry. (Young India: September 22, 1921)
4) Why I am Not a Convert = Hinduism as I know it entirely satisfies my soul, fills my whole being. When doubts haunt me, when disappointments stare me in the face, and when I see not one ray of light on the horizon, I *turn to the Bhagavad Gita, and find a verse to comfort me; and I immediately begin to smile in the midst of overwhelming sorrow. My life has been full of tragedies and if they have not left any visible and indelible effect on me, I owe it to the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita. (Young India: June 8, 1925)
5) Aping of Europeans and Americans = As I wander about through the length and breath of India, I see many Christian Indians almost ashamed of their birth, certainly of their ancestral religion, and of their ancestral dress. The aping of Europeans by Anglo-Indians is bad enough, but the aping of them by Indian converts is a violence done to their country and, shall I say, even to their new religion. (Young India: August 8, 1925)
6) Denationalization = Conversion must not mean denationalization. Conversion should mean a definite giving up of the evil of the old, adoption of all the good of the new and a scrupulous avoidance of everything evil in the new. Conversion, therefore, should mean a life of greater dedication to one’s country, greater surrender to God, greater self-purification. (Young India: August 20, 1925)
7) Undermining People’s Faith = The first distinction I would like to make between your missionary work and mine is that while I am strengthening the faith of people, you (missionaries) are undermining it. (Young India: November 8, 1927)
8) Let the Hindu be a Better Hindu = I came to the conclusion long ago that all religions were true and also that all had some error in them, and whilst I hold by my own, I should hold others as dear as Hinduism. So we can only pray, if we are Hindus, not that a Christian should become a Hindu. But our innermost prayer should be a Hindu should be a better Hindu, a Muslim a better Muslim, a Christian a better Christian. (Young India: January 19, 1928)
9) Christianity and Imperialistic Exploitation = Christianity in India has been inextricably mixed up for the last one hundred and fifty years with British rule. It appears to us as synonymous with materialistic civilization and imperialistic exploitation by the stronger white races of the weaker races of the world. Its contribution to India has been, therefore, largely negative. (Young India: March 21, 1929)
10) Why Should I Change My Religion = I hold that proselytisation under the cloak of humanitarian work is unhealthy to say the least. It is most resented by people here. Religion after all is a deeply personal thing. It touches the heart. Why should I change my religion because the doctor who professes Christianity as his religion has cured me of some disease, or why should the doctor expect me to change whilst I am under his influence? (Young India: April 23, 1931)
11) Physician Heal Yourself = Conversion nowadays has become a matter of business, like any other. India (Hindus) is in no need of conversion of this kind. Conversion in the sense of self-purification, self-realization is the crying need of the times. That however is never what is meant by proselytization. To those who would convert India (Hindus), might it not be said, “Physician, heal yourself.”(Young India: April 23, 1931)
12) True Humility = I disbelieve in the conversion of one person by another. My efforts should never to be to undermine another’s faith. This implies belief in the truth of all religions and, therefore, respect for them. It implies true humility. (Young India April 23 1931)
13) Leave this country = If the Christian church uses its activities of education, healthcare or humanitarian service to change the religion of poor Hindus, I shall ask them definitely, to leave this country and go. (Harijan Dec 7 1931)
14) Conversion is poison = “One sordid motive violates the whole preaching. It is like drop of poison, which fouls the whole food. Therefore, I should do without any preaching at all. A rose does not need to preach. It simply spreads its fragrance. The fragrance is its own sermon …The fragrance of religious and spiritual life is much finer and subtler than of the rose.” (Harijan 22 March 1935)
15) No Such Thing as Conversion = I believe that there is no such thing as conversion from one faith to another in the accepted sense of the word. It is highly personal matter for the individual and his God. I may not have any design upon my neighbor as to his faith which I must honour even as I honour my own. Having reverently studied the scripture of the world I could no more think of asking a Christian or a Muslim, or a Parsi or a Jew to change his faith than I would think of changing my own (Harijan Sept 9 1935)
16) Stop all proselytizing = If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all proselytizing. In Hindu households the advent of a missionary has meant the disruption of the family coming in the wake of change of dress, manners, language, food and drink. (Harijan Nov 5 1935)
17) No Room For Them = In the manner in which they are working there would seem to be no room for them. Quite unconsciously they do harm to themselves and also to us. It is perhaps impertinent to say that they do harm to themselves, but quite pertinent to say that they do harm to us. They do harm to those amongst whom they work and that amongst whom they do not work, i.e., the harm is done to the whole of India. The more I study their activities the more sorry I become. It is a tragedy that such a thing should happen to the human family (Harijan Dec 12 1936)
18) Conversion: Impediment to Peace = It is impossible for me to reconcile myself to the idea of conversion after the style that goes on in India and elsewhere to-day. It is an error which is perhaps the greatest impediment to the world’s progress towards peace. Why should a Christian want to convert a Hindu to Christianity? Why should he not be satisfied if the Hindu is good or godly man? (Harijan Jan 30 1937)
19) Missionary Aim: Uprooting Hinduism = My fear is that though Christian friends nowadays do not say or admit it that Hindu religion is untrue, they must harbour in their breast that Hinduism is an error and that Christianity, as they believe it, is the only true religion. So far as one can understand the present (Christian) effort, it is to uproot Hinduism from her very foundation and replace it by another faith. (Harijan March 13 1937)
20) Missionaries: Vendors of Goods = When the missionary of another religion goes to them, he goes like a vendor of goods. He has no special spiritual merit that will distinguish him from those to whom he goes. He does however possess material goods which he promises to those who will come to his fold (Harijan April 3 1937)
21) Why Should I Change My Religion = I hold that proselytisation under the cloak of humanitarian work is unhealthy to say the least. It is most resented by people here. Religion after all is a deeply personal thing. It touches the heart. Why should I change my religion because the doctor who professes Christianity as his religion has cured me for some disease, or why should the doctor expect me to change whilst I am under his influence (Young India April 23, 1937)
22) Proselytizing = (conversion) under the cloak of humanitarian work is un-health, to say the least and If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all the proselytizing. It is a deadliest poison and ever sapped the fountain of truths. (Young India April 23 1937)
23) Only true religion ? = I am not interested in weaning you from Christianity and making you Hindu, and I do not relish your designs upon me, if you had any, to convert me to Christianity. I would also dispute your claim that Christianity is the only true religion. (Harijan June 3 1937)
24) The Only Begotten Son of God? = I regard Jesus as a great teacher of humanity, but I do not regard him as the only begotten son of God. That epithet in its material interpretation is quite unacceptable. Metaphorically we are all sons of God, but for each of us there may be different sons of God in a special sense. Thus for me Chaitanya may be the only begotten son of God. God cannot be the exclusive Father and I cannot ascribe exclusive divinity to Jesus. (Harijan: June 3, 1937)
25) Outrage! = Only the other day a missionary descended on a famine area with money in his pocket, distributed it among the famine stricken, converted them to his fold, took charge of their temple, and demolished it. This is outrageous. (Harijan Nov 5 1937)
26) Welcome Them Back = If a person through fear, compulsion, starvation, or for material gain or consideration goes over to another faith, it is a misnomer to call it conversion. Most cases of conversion have been to my mind false coin. I would therefore unhesitatingly re-admit to the Hindu fold all such repentants without much ado. If a man comes back to the original branch he deserves to be welcomed in so far as he may deem to have erred, he has sufficiently purged himself of it when he repents his error and retraces his steps. (Collected Works: Vol. 66, pp. 163-164)
27) A rose does not need to preach. = It simply spreads its fragrance.”One sordid motive violates the whole preaching. It is like drop of poison, which fouls the whole food. Therefore, I should do without any preaching at all. A rose does not need to preach. It simply spreads its fragrance. The fragrance is its own sermon …The fragrance of religious and spiritual life is much finer and subtler than of the rose.” (harijan 22 March 1935)
28) Conversion is a blasphemy against God and the self = “Today we see competition and conflict among different religions for counting the number of their followers. I feel deeply ashamed of this and, when I hear of people’s achievement in converting such and such number to a particular faith, I feel that, that is no achievement at all, that on the contrary it is a blasphemy against God and the self.”(Excerpts from the speech delivered at School of Indian Languages, Darjeeling, for missionaries serving in India, on 6-6-1925)
29) “Regarding conversion, I don’t mean that it is never justified. But no one should invite another person to change his or her religion. In my view, the belief which underlines such practice, namely, that one’s own religion is true and another’s is false is an error.
30) In an interview to a missionary, on or before 22-3-1935, Gandhiji complained that missionaries were preaching the gospel of Christ with some motive behind it. “One sordid motive violates the whole preaching. It is like drop of poison, which fouls the whole food. Therefore, I should do without any preaching at all. A rose does not need to preach. It simply spreads its fragrance. The fragrance is its own sermon …The fragrance of religious and spiritual life is much finer and subtler than of the rose.”
Nobel prize = Gandhiji was not awarded the Nobel peace prize because he refused to be converted. Now that missionaries are spreading their tentacles far and wide in India, converting people by allurement, inducement and fraud (in north east India, killings and threats are becoming commonplace), Gandhiji’s message is all the more relevant in understanding and reacting to this problem. Missionary Terrorism will become as dangerous as Islamic terrorism if ignored. Please read & distribute.
Hindu Unity (Home) 